Portal de Cieza

www.portaldecieza.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

The expropriation of certain parcels in the urban area designated as "V-6" in the foothills of La Ermita, better known as "land of Migaseca", an issue that has dragged on for 15 years, may have an economic impact very serious in the near future Hall and undermine its financial sustainability.

This is understood in the group of IU-Greens, whose Councilman Jose Eduardo Illueca will question the Mayor at the next plenary, on this matter.

To this council, "sloppy management, one might almost say that irresponsible this topic by different governments of the People's Party is obvious, and the consequences can be catastrophic in the short-term municipal accounts."

Thus, "the City has lost two court cases: the first has been convicted by a final payment of nearly one million euros plus interest on late sentence, but the second is much more serious, as he ordered to pay nearly five million euros plus interest for delay from the start of the procedure, which could raise this figure to exorbitant levels. "

The team of popular government should explain to the public "how did we come to a situation like this, where the City is doomed to pay large amounts of money, which would leave blanket the Prince of Asturias, in some areas that the market current land not worth even close. "

To Illueca, accountability and mismanagement are unquestionable.

The first mistake, when he was still mayor Paco Lopez, "since it could have been avoided at the time, paying a fair price fixed or consigning it in the budget, which the family had asked one repricing that at a time when the housing market was clearly going upward, placed the value of these lands through the roof. "

On a second occasion, "when the delay with PGMO did expiry of the agreement signed with the owners so these waived at fair value and their prosecution if they increased the buildable land as qualified residential use when it exploded the 'bubble' these gentlemen no longer concerned with the gains of the land, but the price of an expropriation that had nothing to do with the actual values. "

According to the council, "the situation is serious, as if finally is pricing firm of the 4.8 million plus interest, the economic impact will be brutal and will weigh the economic and social development of the town for years."

Therefore, "forced transparency, citizens need to know the exact dimensions of the problem and the status of it, so we raised a plenary interpellation whose reply publicly pledge to spread."

This interpellation Illueca question, inter alia, "whether it was or not accepted for consideration by the Supreme Court on appeal from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Murcia 2012 fixing the price of compensation by almost 5 million plus interest, how high payments for this expropriation, if there has been, detailing principal and interest, which would eventually be the price we have to pay the City if that judgment, as seems likely, enough strength and, importantly, as planned by the government team to meet the payment of this debt and where he hopes to obtain funding for it. "

Source: IU-verdes Cieza