The spokesman for the municipal government, Francisco Saorín, censors the attitude of Vox and PP "by joining both and voting in favor of an unnecessary and even poorly formulated initiative", while acknowledging the "more tempered" position that Citizens is taking during the pandemic of the Covid-19.The spokesman for the municipal government of Cieza has issued a press release, given the difficulty of appearing at the regular press conference, through which he made the assessment of the May ordinary plenary, held this Tuesday once again electronically by imperative of the containment measures.In his assessment, Saorín has referred to the proposals presented in full by the Government, all of them approved, related to the resolutions issued by the mayor's office and the different delegated councilors, extrajudicial recognition of credits from different invoices, approval of the 2019 accounts of the mercantile Radio Cieza and Promociones Empresariales de Cieza, SA and the modification of the components of the informative commissions, which rose to 13, as a consequence of the abandonment of two councilors of the group for which they were elected by the citizens, passing into the situation of not attached.
Likewise, the spokesman has highlighted the file, presented urgently, by the Government regarding the suspension of the municipal tax for occupation of the public highway with tables and chairs.Also, the spokesman has valued the motions presented by the opposition groups, describing as "irresponsible" the only initiative presented by the councilors of Vox for considering that "it had no other purpose than to create social alarm, in addition to being poorly formulated " Saorín clarifies in his statement that "the City Council cannot request a manager of Health Area IX to carry out tests, since this official receives instructions from the Ministry of Health and Health, which has its own established protocols"; initiative to which the PP joined, "without attending to the reasons given in the plenary debate for the motion to be rectified, which shows the serious ignorance or bad intention manifested by the councilors of both municipal groups.""Vox's attitude, for being ill-informed or for wanting to harm the Government, presenting a motion that called into question the situation of the nursing home, when there has been no case of contagion from the Covid-19 or among users or among workers, it was out of place, and the PP's subsequent support for the amendment to replace the Vox group itself at the last moment with a softer one, which was also out of time, is not understandable due to the contradiction that in itself enclosed between its expository part, in which it praised the good management and situation of the residence and the operative part in which it requested that the City Council request the management of Area IX of Health that all workers be tested " , Saorín has specified.Regarding the situation of the nursing home, the government spokesman has stated that the municipal government, through its delegate councilors of Health and Social Welfare, has been in permanent direct contact with the Directorate of the entity during these two months, " attending to the requests that they have been requesting, such as masks, gloves, gels, as well as a disinfection of the exterior of the building that has been carried out this Monday by the municipal services.
"Regarding the two motions presented by Ciudadanos, Saorín highlighted the "tempered attitude of this political group, making a request to be able to use the surplus of the 2019 budget to mitigate the effects of the crisis, approved unanimously, in line with the agreements and requests of the Spanish Federation of Municipalities and being one of the claims that have been made by all the Spanish municipalities.
"As for the second of the Citizens' motions, in which the creation of a special study commission on Cieza's economic and social revival plan was requested, it was amended by the government team, replacing said commission with a table, with the argument that the commission assumes a cost of up to 2,340 euros per meeting, as assistance for its components, while the substitution by the option presented by the Government does not entail any cost to the municipal coffers.
The replacement amendment was approved unanimously.Saorín has also made mention of "the attitude of some councilors who, with an almost concluded year of legislature, limit their interventions to the question and answer section, having not provided any initiative." The spokesman has blamed these "an irresponsible attitude and lack of ethics, by entangling and tarnishing what should be a true plenary debate." "These councilmen thus try to justify a job that they have not been doing and for which they receive an economic allocation of 180 euros for attendance at each plenary session from the municipal coffers," said Saorín.The government spokesman has concluded the statement asking for understanding for the difficulty involved in carrying out the telematic plenary sessions, while supporting the opposition groups "because from this crisis we have to come up with all the shoulders."
Source: Ayuntamiento de Cieza