Portal de Cieza

www.portaldecieza.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

| The government spokesman, in his assessment of the July ordinary plenary session, points out that PP, Cs and Vox have filled the quota of motions , although in the tone of "being little elaborated or being type motions" | This Wednesday, the spokesperson for the municipal government of Cieza, Francisco Saorín, carried out the usual assessment of the ordinary plenary session in July, conducted by videoconference, stating that, "plenary session after plenary session, the strength of the Government, its incessant activity and their good work, facing the weakness of the opposition "and pointing out that PP, Cs and Vox have covered the quota of motions, although in the spirit of" being little elaborated and sometimes to talk about what is already done or be motions kind".In relation to the initiatives presented by the coalition government made up of the PSOE and IU-Verdes, Saorín explained that, in addition to accounting for the resolutions taken by the Mayor and the Mayor's holdings and the stability evaluation report contemplated in The organic law 20/2012, of the mercantile Aguas de Cieza, SA, referring to the 2019 financial year, the Executive had three proposals that were approved: the first one on the designation of local festivities for the 2021 financial year; the second, in relation to the City Council's adherence to the network of local entities to develop the SDGs of the 2030 Agenda, and the third, on the constitution of the municipal commission for the demarcation, demarcation and marking of the municipal terms of Cieza and Hellin.As for the motions of the opposition, the government spokesman has described as "unnecessary, little elaborated and lacking information", the initiative of the PP in relation to compliance with current legislation on animals; on the one hand, because the explanatory statement of the same is that of an interpellation or questions to the delegate councilor, not of a motion, and, on the other, because everything stated in its operative part is being fulfilled, therefore it did not provide Nothing.

"Regarding the second initiative of the popular group, referring to the minimum vital income and specifically to the transfer of resources from the Government of Spain to the CCAA and local entities to manage aid,It was rejected with arguments by the councilor for Social Policies defending the management capacity of the municipalities and specifically that Cieza's "has been carrying out this task from the first moment."In relation to the motions presented by Ciudadanos, Saorín recalled that the one referring to the creation of a registry for the use of the fleet of municipally owned vehicles had to be improved by the delegate councilor for Heritage, as a further point was approved by means of a substitution amendment presented by it.

The second, in which the attendance of the opposition groups to the contracting tables was proposed, was withdrawn by the proponent, as the appropriate resolution was signed before the plenary session.Finally, the first motion of Vox on the use of street cleaning blowers, after arguing the impossibility of their immediate elimination, the Councilor for Circular Economy, Antonio Moya, presented a replacement amendment, in which he bet on the progressive elimination of the aforementioned blowers as stated in the 2020-21 plan, which was the one that was finally approved.

Regarding the second initiative aimed at the implementation of the Health Fair, the municipal government asked the proposing councilor of Vox to leave the motion at point one with the condition that the Fair be held when the epidemiological conditions they allow it, but eliminating the rest of points for being unaffordable.

He was also censured for returning to the fray with his "test for all" proposal, a competition,at the moment, from the Ministry of Health who is the one to whom they must address.

However, Vox maintained its full motion, so it was rejected by the plenary, obtaining only the affirmative vote of the two councilors of Vox and that of the unaccounted councilor Laura Villa.The government spokesman has finished his assessment of the plenary session referring to the "misuse" that the councilors of the opposition have been doing on request and question time, "since the plenary regulation that establishes that these must be presented by written before the informative commissions are held.

""The opposition, far from using this point to request information or suggest improvements to the delegated councilors, which requires their presentation in due time to adequately prepare the responses, are engaged, with rare exceptions as in the case of this plenary session by Councilman Juan Pedro Ruiz of Ciudadanos, to ask questions 'in voce', with the sole intention of 'catching' the questioned councilor, which, on the other hand, they do not usually achieve given that the government team is well acquainted with the reality of the municipality and each councilor of its delegations ", concluded Saorín.

Source: Ayuntamiento de Cieza