Portal de Cieza

www.portaldecieza.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

Recently, the opposition in Congress has rejected the Government's proposal on the use of the Superavit of the City Councils, as well as its processing as a bill offering or agreeing on other alternatives.

Formations such as VOX, Bildu or PP and CS voted against the proposal, and refused to allow it to be processed as a bill, acting in a way that was not open to dialogue and without a "parliamentary" sense.

For this reason, the PSOE of Cieza has sent a press release, in which it regrets that the attitude of the opposition, which did not offer any alternative, has prevented the allocation of 4.2 million euros for Financially Sustainable Investments in Cieza, which would also not count towards the rule.

of expense.

In this way the opposition, and especially the PP,It re-imposed on the municipalities the spending rule that the Government of Spain wanted to eliminate.

It should be remembered that the spending rule arises in 2012 with the "Montoro Law", and is characterized by limiting spending to City Halls, preventing them from using their resources or savings.

Now there was an opportunity to eliminate it as proposed by the Government of Spain, and allow in the case of Cieza to make use of those 4.2 million euros.

The socialists of Cieza are not surprised by the attitude of the PP, who were the ones who imposed that spending rule, but we have been surprised by the attitude of Ciudadanos, a party that always talks about eliminating the spending rule and allowing the use of the Superavit but at the moment of truth he has prevented it with his vote.Montoro Law ", and it is characterized by limiting spending to municipalities, preventing them from using their resources or savings.

Now there was an opportunity to eliminate it as proposed by the Government of Spain, and allow in the case of Cieza to make use of those 4.2 million euros.

The socialists of Cieza are not surprised by the attitude of the PP, who were the ones who imposed that spending rule, but we have been surprised by the attitude of Ciudadanos, a party that always talks about eliminating the spending rule and allowing the use of the Superavit but at the moment of truth he has prevented it with his vote.Montoro Law ", and it is characterized by limiting spending to municipalities, preventing them from using their resources or savings.

Now there was an opportunity to eliminate it as proposed by the Government of Spain, and allow in the case of Cieza to make use of those 4.2 million euros.

The socialists of Cieza are not surprised by the attitude of the PP, who were the ones who imposed this spending rule, but we have been surprised by the attitude of Ciudadanos, a party that always talks about eliminating the spending rule and allowing the use of the Superavit but at the moment of truth he has prevented it with his vote.The socialists of Cieza are not surprised by the attitude of the PP, who were the ones who imposed that spending rule, but we have been surprised by the attitude of Ciudadanos, a party that always talks about eliminating the spending rule and allowing the use of the Superavit but at the moment of truth he has prevented it with his vote.The socialists of Cieza are not surprised by the attitude of the PP, who were the ones who imposed this spending rule, but we have been surprised by the attitude of Ciudadanos, a party that always talks about eliminating the spending rule and allowing the use of the Superavit but at the moment of truth he has prevented it with his vote.The Stability Law of 2012, (Montoro Law), lacks common sense since it prevents the City Councils from using all their resources, so an agreement of the main formations is urgently needed so that it can be modified, since it is the Legislative power ( Congress and Senate) who legislates in our country.

If the opposition did not like the formula proposed by the Government, they could have proposed other alternatives and processed the text as a bill, making good use of parliament, but rejecting the Government's proposal has prevailed rather than addressing the general interest.

The main reason argued by the opposition is the matter of transferring remnants to the state, an issue that the Government's proposal left voluntarily and optionally to be decided by the City Councils, and that in any case,as we have been saying, it could have been the object of dialogue and modification.Finally, the town of Cieza once again pays for the consequences of the "austerity" policies imposed with the Montoro Law of 2012, and unless a new agreement is produced in the coming days that eliminates the spending rule, it will not be possible.

use the Superavit and the additional amount offered by the Government of Spain is lost, which in total would have involved investments of approximately 4.2 million euros.

Source: PSOE Cieza