Portal de Cieza

www.portaldecieza.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

The PP of Cieza has reproached the PSOE for not supporting a proposal that failed to convince neither the other opposition groups, nor people who were on their own list, getting only 3 votes in favor (3 councilors of the PP). The proposal was presented as an addiction amendment in the last Extraordinary Plenary, at a point where a modification of credits was debated.

It should be noted that the modifications have a regulated processing procedure similar to that of budgets, for this reason having voted in favor of the motion to add the PP would not imply immediately carrying out its content, but rather returning the file of modification of credits and having to redo it again with the new reports and a new proposal, something doubtful considering that in order to be valid it must come into force in 2020 after being published in the BORM and pass the allegations process.

The credit modification files have a specific procedure and it is not equal to any point in an Ordinary Plenary.

Therefore the "Amendments "that are presented, as in the Budgets, must have a special formality, if not, their only effect is to return the file and begin to assemble it ex novo. However, getting to the bottom of the matter, regarding his proposal for an extraordinary credit of 300,000 Euros in aid to the hospitality sector, we say: You do not have to create any extraordinary credit.

The extraordinary loan was already created in the spring of this year with 400,000 euros for aid to trade in general, having carried out various support campaigns and direct lines of aid.

Therefore, it is not correct to ask for an extraordinary loan. At the moment, a campaign to support the sector is still underway, so the credit granted by the Municipal Government has not yet been exhausted. We deduce that in reality, what they wanted to ask was to expand the item by 300,000 euros (not an extraordinary loan) and to take out a new line of aid for this year.

At this time near the end of the year, this is materially impossible, since this item is not extendable to 2021.

Once the amendment enters into force, it is necessary to approve and publish subsidy bases, admit applications, approve them or give a deadline for corrections when appropriate, process them and then make the payment before December 30.

The credit modifications of Chapter 4, (aid or subsidies) are not extendable to the following year, so a new credit would have to be approved in 2021 if all of the above is not done before December 31. The correct thing, which is what the Municipal Government will do, would be to start a new line of aid or subsidies in 2021, once those that are still being processed are concluded and with enough time to be able to carry out all of the above. On the other hand, they also requested an extraordinary loan to carry out a new phase of the "collector".

We must remember that two months ago, it was approved in the Ordinary Plenary by consensus of all the groups to sign an agreement with the CARM to co-finance this infrastructure, as is usual in the PP of Cieza they have not taken 100 days to break their commitment , sacrificing consensus in exchange for a few minutes of demagogy and posturing. At the moment a phase of that collector is being tendered, so it does not make sense to enable a game for a later phase now, when the previous phase has not yet started and also we do not have an agreement with the CARM nor are the exact amounts known.

each Administration must finance.

Enabling at this time a game of 700,000 Euros for this new phase, would only serve to have that money "dead laughing", waiting for the previous phase to evolve and the signing of the aforementioned agreement to co-finance the work, since that amount alone would insufficient. Thus, it is not true that they voted "against the collector" since that proposal no collector could get, in the same way that it was not useful to give new aid to the hotel industry. Therefore, the PP proposal was a populist proposal that only sought the posture, which did not deceive any councilman outside the PP, and which can only be explained if we see the desperation and degeneration in which this political formation is installed.

Source: PSOE Cieza