Portal de Cieza

www.portaldecieza.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

The Town Planning announces that his political group, if the company won the lawsuit, raise the filing of a claim for liability against the PP councilors who voted in favor of the approval of this planning agreement.

After the claim of 600,000 euros by the company Cieza Golf SL to the City of Cieza, the first deputy mayor and Town Planning, Francisco Saorín, she has appeared at a press conference in his opinion, "refresh the memory of the origin of these crazy projects that have fallen on their own and which has been a ruin for Cieza, to remember who are responsible for these outrages, to explain what the claim is based and why we believe they are wrong, to reassure neighbors who are alarmed by this new 'heist' to the municipal coffers, since the legal services of the city council are working very well to win this lawsuit, and to announce that if lost, the aldermen of IU-Green will pose the filing of a claim for liability against those who voted for the approval of this planning agreement, the agreement signed with the defunct Public Water, approval of the Municipal General Management Plan that ratified it, and against Antonio Tamayo , who in his capacity as mayor of Cieza he signed everything. "

To Saorín, "the origin of these outrages is a crazy urban policy practiced by the PP for the requalification of 20.5 million m2 of rural land to building land was approved by planning agreements 'signed a la carte' with different commercial in order to build 34,663 homes and five golf courses with an expected population of 107,231 new residents in the municipality. "

In this regard, he stated that "in the case of Cieza Golf was lifting a residential tourist resort with golf 18 holes, plus 8,000 homes, a hotel, apartment and shopping center. In exchange for requalification of land the company had to pay the City 12 million euros, of which 25 percent (three million) had to be paid after the final approval of the PGMO. of those three million commodity ahead with 600,000 euros two payments of 300,000 euros each claiming returned to him now. "

"The nonsense in those years, between 2004 and 2006, reached such an extent that from the municipal government was said that the City would enter 100 million euros thanks to these development companies that were really nothing more than mere speculators, that 3,000 jobs would be created, and even, in his ravings, the Councillor for Urbanism and daughter of the mayor went on to say that with so many revenues ciezanos no longer pay taxes. the reality 10 years later it is in sight. in this case there are responsible with names and surnames that are Antonio Tamayo and PP councilors who voted this nonsense "censured.

He stated that "the agreement signed with Cieza Golf, like the rest, need water, lots of water, a total of 13 Hm3 per year (only Cieza Golf needed 2,34 Hm3 water / year), and as the Hydrographic Confederation of Segura at the request of IU, he issued a report on June 15, 2006 certifying the absence of water resources to meet the brutal demand, three months later, the municipal government of the PP agreed to the signing of an agreement with the Public Water Utility by which it agreed to provide 7 Hm3 of water from the desalination plant tailings future. it was not just a legal monstrosity created by Valcárcel and regional PP to skirt the law, which never worked. a monstrosity now disappeared ".

Regarding the lawsuit filed by Cieza Golf, the Town Planning explained that "is based on the City Council can not provide the water to which it committed and therefore has to repay the money the company forward and that the PP He was spent on parties and revelry But the applicant omits four substantive aspects. the first, which is her and the other companies to which they were entitled to build and pay for the pipeline to bring water from the desalination plant tailings as set in the agreement they all signed with the City Council and the Community; the second, that the advance of 600,000 euros corresponding to payment of 3 million euros that was required to pay after the final approval of PGMO, according to the agreement signed, and that the said plan was approved at the time by the CCAA, the third that the company has not filed the Partial Plan to develop the area and therefore can not blame that has no water has not requested;

and fourth, that while the Public Water Utility has dissolved, its developer, the CCAA not and therefore it is responsible for providing the water at the time requested. "

Saorín, he expressed his "absolute confidence" in the legal department of the City Council takes the case "and that I am sure will bring to the court all the necessary evidence for the claims of Cieza Golf are rejected".

But it has gone beyond;

Thus, in the judicial aspect it has announced that "if the City lost the lawsuit and was forced to return those 600,000 euros claimed by the company, the council of IU-Green We would make the filing of a claim for liability against PP councilors who voted in favor of the approval of this planning agreement ".

Finally, he has used his appearance before the media to require the council of the popular group, with Juan Manuel Molina to head to "publicly denounce the urban blunders made by his predecessors, claiming the resignation of those who committed these abuses and still they have responsibilities within the ciezano PP, with its president Antonio Tamayo to the head, and matching side municipal government to defend the interests of the neighbors. "

Source: Ayuntamiento de Cieza