After the debates arising from the adoption of the budgets approved unilaterally by the PP, in a press release, the party calls sultry magenta budgets submitted by the local executive and idle labor councilor of Finance and the repulsive Municipal spokesman discourse.
First, we find a budget inoperative and sloppy, as are six months late months of action which are limited to the month of November, which denotes the apathy with which the local executive, specifically the Department of Finance led by Francis Brown, works, leaving a budget Cieza deferred previous year.
Thus, as has been passed by the council, the delay in the presentation of the budget was due to careful study for better preparation.
On expenditure side, we found a decrease in maintenance or even basic items, as well as an increase in deferrable manifestly items with clear intention propaganda for the government itself, as the line to the indoor pool or the Capitol Theatre, constituting a scandal to be a mere patch, it does not address the future management diligently on both buildings, postponing it, as well as funding, to the passing of events, as has been seen in the case of the pool .
On the other hand, we found a significant reduction in the allocations to the `` temporary'' county councils, reflecting the serious commitment of Employment Councillor Antonia Bello Giménez, showing harsh towards the tragedy of unemployment in our city, in periods where agriculture, the primary economic activity of the city, is lacking.
With regard to the response expressed by Executive spokeswoman Gonzalez Parra opposition, shouting that `` if any opposition wants to fire officials or close social centers'' qualifying councilor and give clear signal character and opportunistic demagogue his speeches, because that statement is not far from being a fallacy no validity whatsoever, done that, not by adjudication, but by pure pragmatism reflects its action and that of all his colleagues in the consistory city.
The alternative proposed by UPyD not dismiss officials, or close social centers, understanding the serious issue of general government revenues suffer in our country, we understand that you can not increase the budget, why do not demagoguery and political groups Cieza, but insist on a better distribution of resources, giving priority to employment and social services, as well as, as far as possible, invest in infrastructure that are central to the economic development of the city as well as undertake new not work without properly maintain existing ones.
Moreover, in these assumptions, it is clear the concern of the council by the drama of unemployment, reduced almost to nothing, or insufficiently, heading to training and employment promotion and agricultural items.
It should be mentioned that the only item that does not reduce the costs is to latisueldos the mayors, who are still outrageous, and must begin the PP spokesman in the city for this, instead of guessing about the dismissal of civil servants by the opposition .
If this is the `` best estimate'' that the PP has to offer, you need to rethink what the councilors popular or otherwise, enact the resignation of Councillor of Finance or better than the best, give way to the alternation because this palpable resignation Executive barren follow us plunging into decay and tail on regional scales.
Source: UPyD Cieza