The IU-Greens councilor, José Eduardo Illueca, stressed in his assessment of the development of the October regular plenary session the importance of the Rules of Participation "as a channel for greater involvement of citizens in the institutional life of the town, where ventilate matters affecting them directly and often decisive, both individually and through associations that form the social fabric of the municipality. "
Therefore, the council ecosocialists October rose to the plenary a draft prepared by area youth IU-Greens "whose objective was to claim a lock out urgent suffering of this standard text for eighteen months, when they were closed drafting of the draft of the same after several months of work by a committee in which we participate the four political groups represented in the city of Cieza ".
Although the proposal was rejected by the party in government, the councilor in charge of public participation assured that the regulation would be definitely completed before year end.
Illueca hopes "that the PP does comply this time their commitment to adopt and publish this standard and, in addition, I sincerely hope that the text pre-agreed by all the members of the drafting committee, including the councilor of the government team is not ultimately devalued in terms of participation rights that are recognized Cieza citizens in political and institutional life of the municipality ".
Also referred Illueca the debate generated around the joint proposal of the three opposition political groups to restore unity on the issue of the Tajo-Segura, stating, "IU-Greens has a proprietary position and perfectly defined in around the issue of the transfer of the Tagus, which we announced in September debate and whose defense pillars of this infrastructure for its economic and social importance, the use of the river as a vehicle of its waters and the generation of consensus with all affected sectors, among which are, of course, the farmers, but also others, such as water users 'mouth' or environmental advocacy organizations. "
The joint proposal brought to the House represents "a coincidence at all timely and strategic to the other groups, moved by the undeniable fact that the People's Party tried to force in the previous plenary unanimity of 'swallow it' about a document that was not known by anyone in content, something unaffordable from the point of view of democratic dignity ".
To Illueca, "if something is questionable to what was said in the House, it is the tone used by the Councillor PP spokesman in the debate, rudeness bordering on policy, and from my point of view, in bad taste, to try to discredit the opposition groups, to do this, from IU-Greens can assure you that we will continue working in this area, as we always have, to generate the broadest possible consensus. "
Source: IU-verdes Cieza