Portal de Cieza

www.portaldecieza.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

In his usual to assess the regular plenary session held on Wednesday, January 8th communication, IU-Greens councilor José Eduardo Illueca wanted to highlight, above anything else, "the presence and citizen participation in Ascoy neighbors Plenary Hall, something that speaks volumes about your level of neighborhood and civic consciousness and that is a sign of democratic health. "

According Illueca, "Ascoy neighbors got a sample copy of civility and poise when the team raise their positions PP government on the implementation of agreements plenary and though the Mayor was seen somewhat forced into their explanations, giving the feeling of wanting to to process as quickly as possible to a situation that was uncomfortable, we expect the public formulation of the question by the neighbors is an incentive for the City, within their means, exert maximum pressure to avoid an absurdity that seems consummated. "

To claim this councilor of these neighbors, "who have stopped receiving mail service for residential properties in the town of Ascoy is completely fair, and from IU-Greens will support all initiatives unconditionally departing from them with the intention of pressuring Post company and reveal that the situation is that they are left helpless in communications, when it comes to citizens who pay their taxes like everyone. "

It is true that the emails are not powers of the City, "but you can always press more energy and the Administration has weapons for this, we have recently seen with agricultural insurance and other issues, it is not enough to send a communication to Post and be waiting for reply, go beyond the City Council because the problems of the residents are or should be the problems of the City Council. "

As for the other issues discussed in plenary, to Illueca, the most important was the negative, "unreasonable from our point of view," to reclaim the vehicles over 25 years and historical with the statutory cap 100 100 in Road Tax.

According to the mayor, "the finance council gave the feeling of not having understood very well the content of the proposal, as their explanations saying only bonuses already 100 100 vehicles classified as historical."

According ecosocialists, "the councilman was confused because the motion refers to the enabling law that gives tribute to local councils to reclaim between 0 and 100 100 vehicles over 25 years or historical which, in our opinion, are part of the historical and cultural heritage of the people. "

These vehicle "are subsidized with 50 100 of the fee, and what was the motion was equating with motorcycles for over 25 years, which the ordinance if the maximum amount in bonuses."

To Illueca, "there are reasons of fairness and preservation of culture and historical memory that support themselves, more in crisis, such as a tax measure proposal, against this, the Councillor for Finance has not provided a single economic data based on the number of vehicles that may be affected or the revenue impact of the measure, which could have been discussed, and justified in a way completely confused rejection which is hard to understand. "

Source: IU-verdes Cieza