Portal de Cieza

www.portaldecieza.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

IU-Green has always said that "the work is disproportionate cost and a paradigm of waste", but once consummated "his administration's public affairs and concerns everyone."

IU-Greens Cieza has answered criticism by the PP against this formation following an interpellation made by its spokesman, Antonio Penalva, which was interested in going to be in effect when the rules of operation of the Capitol Theatre.

In the opinion of this council, "The criticism of the Partido Popular councilors IU-Greens are unusual both in form of cockney expression and the content thereof, especially since shines a clear feeling that Antonio Tamayo and his team government considered the theater New Capitol as his private farm. "

Indeed, for spokesman ecosocialista training, "only from a basic authoritarian and undemocratic position can be understood that the legitimacy of a political party to be interested in the regulation of the operation of a municipal facility is in question and unfortunately for everyone it is increasingly evident PP drift towards such positions. "

Therefore, Penalva believes there to remind Tamayo and his administration "the Capitol theater is all ciezanos and Murcia, which are those who have paid, and gives some political embarrassment pretend appropriate what is public property and be the only ones with the authority to participate in its management and review it, arguing that it is his political project, as if this were hiciese owners of all that which is. "

From IU-Greens "have always criticized the draft for demolition popular not Capitol restoration and construction of a new theater for two basic reasons: they did not respect the historical memory of the people of Cieza and because it was a project Pharaonic, disproportionately work in cost and a paradigm of waste, and, of course, we fully reaffirm these reviews, also we have criticized the amendment project that eliminated mandatory improvements and was an administrative blunder which is in courts and, ultimately canceled by them. "

But the walking of the Capitol Theatre ended and infrastructure has begun to function, and in view Penalva, "ciezanos all have the right not only to use but also review their management, this law becomes responsibility if it is the political parties that are in opposition, and certainly, no one and nothing will abdicate our rights do not shirk our responsibilities. "

Spokesman for IU-Greens, "one thing is to exercise a rigorous review governance model installed in the waste and extravagance, as it has been for years the PP in Cieza Cieza and outside, which led us to the current plight, and quite another to existing infrastructure, however it was criticized at the time the decision to build them, are to be managed according to criteria of general interest if PP politicians who do not understand something as simple, there are only two explanations: either a surprising simplicity of mind or shameful bad faith. "

Penalva did not want to come to appreciate other expressions contained in the note by the PP, "which are located in the area of ​​insult and bad taste, which is not our style."

But if you wanted to remember the Popular Party to the main "shame" that all Spain could see the opening day of the Capitol "was that of a group of politicians cardboard stone completely insensitive to the cry that different groups in the region rose against against cuts and mortgage foreclosures. "

Source: IU-verdes Cieza