In the words of Antonio Penalva spokesman IU-Greens in the city of Cieza, "Business Promotions workers take too long to suffer the problems of poor management by the municipality, problems have accounted unbearable delays in receipt of their wages, hence our highest level of commitment to solving the problems of these workers and achieving maximum employment and wage stability. "
That said, Penalva has made clear that the solution to the problems of these workers "bypasses joining the staff of the City outside the legally established procedures, the City Council, with the agreement, supports the existence of a labor violation grave, the consequence for workers could be the right choice, but since it is a public service and not a business these workers would become permanent staff not fixed, which would have no rights and can be fired with only 8 days of compensation and no rights to the places where these are provided, as required by law, through an open competition process. "
The illegal transfer of workers, Penalva explains, "is a classified as very serious social sanctions regime offense, punishable in all cases and a minimum fine of 3000 euros."
To this council, "is quite unusual for an administration to adopt an agreement where 'confesses' a violation of this nature, which always has a fraudulent nature, normal, logical, if the City Council to act within the limits of the law, as assumes, is that the legality of action followed defend, is resorted to admission to overcome a very serious turn, some legal mechanisms which have constitutional relevance illegality, such as the principles of equality, merit and ability in access to public service; partners can not agree with these consequences, which has all the appearance of a case of fraud ".
According ciezanos ecosocialistas, "the political and legal implications of this matter may be serious and unavoidable, so that the City should do is defend the legality of the contracts it has with ideas and their execution, correcting immediate aspects diverted, which is, of course, rejected the claim, and that a judge, in any case, who declare the existence of possible illegal and the consequent right to choose workers affected by the transfer, not the City. "
Finally, Penalva argues that "if the City confesses that he has been making a serious and sustained labor illegality in time, and it does nothing less than the range of a Plenum, someone should immediately assume political responsibilities, and people responsible for this unlawful conduct, with such severe consequences, should resign or be political if expedientados accordance with the regulations if it is technical, not anything can be raised in a democratic logic. "
Moreover, "if the agreement is finally adopted in the terms set out and arrived to lead responsibilities for the council in the form of administrative punishment, which would be virtually certain if it should intervene Labour Inspectors from the United Left statement is required Overtake the corresponding file for those responsibilities to the people responsible for this illegal conduct of the same team responsible government confesses to move. "
Source: IU-verdes Cieza