Portal de Cieza

www.portaldecieza.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

For José Eduardo Illueca Councilman IU-Greens in the city of Cieza, "the feeling that prevails after the conclusion of the regular November plenary is sad" because "there was a large group of young people in our town who attended the City Hall in search of a public explanations that Mayor Tamayo refused to give. "

These young people feel cheated by the City and, in particular, by Councilman employment and training, "after attending a course for unemployed under 30, organized by the Department in which the placements were degrading, had nothing to do with the educational content of the activity how to start a business and to make matters worse, were unpaid, which had publicly promised Councilman employment. "

Although other similar occasions has allowed neighbors to intervene before the start of the plenary to express their complaints or requests so it happened a few months ago, for example, with neighbors Ascoy, concerning the abolition of home mail delivery, this Once the Mayor "clung to the Regulations and did not consent, but it was well requested from the group IU-Green, the only thing agreed was to receive in private to the victims of course to invite you to their grievances and demands in writing ".

The IU-Greens group had recorded a written question regarding this issue, "but it was not possible in this way cause explanations, since the House adjourned at 12 hours without discussing all motions without reaching once again, Time for questions and answers. "

All this, according Illueca, "indicates a serious lack of democratic quality in the operation of City Hall, where neighbors who have a serious problem in your relationship with this institution does not get public explanation of the Mayor, or on its own initiative or through their political representatives in Parliament, one can only conclude that the City needs urgent Cieza bath democracy. "

An agreement with "hidden project" and unaffordable conditions

In another vein, Illueca explained that "we voted against the agreement with AQUAMED for the realization of a coastal walk along 7 kilometers of river banks, on both banks, with the absolute uncertainty of what you want do, because although Councilman Tamayo said that there was a project, this is not on the record, and simply verbally indicate some traces of it. "

For ecosocialists councilors, "an environmentally sensitive material can not give a blank check, and it is unseemly that the project conceals the opposition councilors while being asked to vote in favor of the agreement for execution shortly less than an act of faith. "

Moreover, "some conditions of the agreement are unacceptable and could, if given hurts, compromising the municipal budget stability, as noted in his report the intervention, nor is it acceptable that the City assume alone the preservation and future maintenance, even relieving of its powers to the Confederation; not to mention that it conveniante company ACQUAMED, has been widely questioned for alleged irregularities and is currently under investigation by the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor "

Source: IU-verdes Cieza